EV/EBITDA Calculator
$
$
$
EBITDA Build-Up
$
$
$
$
Market Cap
$0
Enterprise Value
$0
EBITDA
$0
EV/EBITDA Multiple
0x
Implied Valuation at a Target Multiple
Implied Enterprise Value
$0
Implied Market Cap
$0
Implied Share Price
$0
Upside / Downside
0%
Current PriceImplied Price
๐Ÿ“– EV/EBITDA โ€” Valuing the Whole Business
EV/EBITDA is the valuation multiple professional analysts and M&A practitioners reach for most often when comparing companies, precisely because it solves a problem that P/E and PEG can't: it values the entire business โ€” equity and debt holders combined โ€” rather than just the equity slice, and it strips out the effects of financing decisions, tax jurisdictions, and depreciation policy that can make two otherwise-similar companies look very different on a P/E basis alone.
Why Enterprise Value, Not Just Market Cap
Enterprise Value = Market Cap + Total Debt โˆ’ Cash & Equivalents
Market cap only reflects the value of a company's equity โ€” what shareholders own. But a company's operations are funded by both equity and debt, and an acquirer buying the whole business would need to take on its debt (a real cost) while getting access to its cash (a real benefit, since it could be used immediately to help pay down that debt). Enterprise value captures the true total cost of acquiring the underlying business, independent of how it happens to be financed today.
Worked Example: Building EV From the Ground Up
A company trades at $80/share with 50 million shares outstanding, has $1.2 billion in total debt, and holds $300 million in cash:
ComponentAmount
Market Cap (Price ร— Shares)$4.00 billion
+ Total Debt$1.20 billion
โˆ’ Cash & Equivalents$0.30 billion
Enterprise Value$4.90 billion
Notice the enterprise value of $4.90 billion is meaningfully higher than the $4.00 billion market cap โ€” a reminder that market cap alone understates what it would actually cost to acquire and control this entire business once its debt obligations are factored in.
Why EBITDA Instead of Net Income
EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization
EBITDA adds back the expenses most affected by financing structure (interest), tax jurisdiction (taxes), and accounting policy choices (depreciation and amortization), leaving a measure of operating profitability that's far more comparable across companies with different capital structures, different tax situations, or different accounting treatment of fixed assets. Continuing the example above, with $280 million net income, $60 million interest, $70 million taxes, and $150 million combined D&A, EBITDA comes to $560 million โ€” and dividing the $4.90 billion enterprise value by this gives an EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.75x.
Reading the EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA RangeGeneral Context
Below 6xOften mature, low-growth, or out-of-favor industries (utilities, some industrials)
6x โ€“ 10xTypical range for many established, moderately growing businesses
10x โ€“ 15xHigher-growth or higher-quality businesses, or sectors the market favors
Above 15xHigh-growth technology, niche, or speculative names โ€” or a potential sign of overvaluation
These ranges vary enormously by sector and by market conditions โ€” there's no single "correct" multiple. The real value of EV/EBITDA comes from comparing it against close peers in the same industry, not from checking it against a single universal benchmark.
Using a Peer Multiple to Find Implied Value
Once you know a company's EBITDA, applying a peer or sector-average EV/EBITDA multiple gives an implied enterprise value โ€” and working backward from there (subtracting debt, adding back cash, dividing by shares) gives an implied share price. Applying a peer multiple of 12x to this example's $560 million EBITDA implies an enterprise value of $6.72 billion, an implied market cap of $5.82 billion, and an implied share price of roughly $116.40 โ€” a meaningful premium to the current $80 share price, suggesting the company may be undervalued relative to that peer group, assuming its fundamentals genuinely justify trading at a similar multiple.
EV/EBITDA vs P/E vs PEG: When to Use Which
MetricBest ForLimitation
P/E RatioQuick comparison of similarly-financed, profitable companiesDistorted by debt levels, tax rates, and one-time items; meaningless for unprofitable companies
PEG RatioAdjusting P/E for differences in growth rateInherits all of P/E's weaknesses, plus depends on a growth estimate that can be wrong
EV/EBITDAComparing companies with different debt levels or capital structures, and in M&A contextsIgnores capital intensity differences (companies needing heavy ongoing capex look the same as those that don't)
โš  EV/EBITDA ignores capital expenditure requirements entirely โ€” a capital-intensive business that must constantly reinvest in equipment can look just as attractive as an asset-light business on this metric alone, even though the asset-light business converts far more of its EBITDA into actual free cash flow. Always pair EV/EBITDA with a look at capex and free cash flow before drawing conclusions.
๐Ÿ’ก When comparing EV/EBITDA across companies, make sure you're using a consistent definition of EBITDA โ€” some companies report "adjusted EBITDA" with additional add-backs (stock-based compensation, restructuring charges, one-time items) that can make their multiple look more attractive than a strict, unadjusted calculation would show.
โ“ Frequently Asked Questions
What is EV/EBITDA? +
EV/EBITDA divides a company's enterprise value (the total value of its equity and debt combined, minus cash) by its EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). It's a widely used valuation multiple for comparing companies regardless of their capital structure or financing decisions.
How is enterprise value different from market cap? +
Market cap only values a company's equity. Enterprise value adds total debt (since an acquirer would need to take it on) and subtracts cash (since it could immediately be used to offset that debt), giving a more complete picture of what it would cost to acquire and control the entire underlying business. EV = Market Cap + Total Debt โˆ’ Cash
Why use EBITDA instead of net income or EPS? +
EBITDA adds back interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, removing the effects of financing structure, tax jurisdiction, and accounting policy choices. This makes it easier to compare the underlying operating profitability of companies that might otherwise look very different due to how they're financed or where they're headquartered.
What is a good EV/EBITDA multiple? +
It depends heavily on the industry โ€” mature, low-growth sectors often trade at single-digit multiples, while high-growth sectors can trade well above 15x. There's no universal "good" multiple; the most useful comparison is against close peers in the same industry, not a fixed benchmark.
How do I use a peer multiple to value a stock? +
Multiply the company's EBITDA by the peer or sector-average EV/EBITDA multiple to get an implied enterprise value. Then subtract total debt and add back cash to get an implied market cap, and divide by shares outstanding to get an implied share price โ€” exactly what this calculator's reverse valuation section does automatically.
What does EV/EBITDA miss? +
It ignores capital expenditure requirements โ€” a business that must constantly reinvest heavily in equipment or infrastructure can show the same EV/EBITDA as an asset-light business, despite converting far less of that EBITDA into actual free cash flow. Always check capex and free cash flow alongside EV/EBITDA, not in isolation.